I wished I lived in a world where this was not a political topic.
Surely by 2025 we should understand that gender is multidimensional? And if we don't understand it, perhaps leave it to doctors and psychologists and, you know, the people affected by all of this, the ones who don't find the simple version of gender meets their needs?
Paul E. Griffiths made the argument that the gamete definition of sex is correct, but that some people are neither male nor female. For instance, the girl with Turner syndrome would have no biological sex, since she produces no gametes. And if there’s some case in which someone can produce both, then they’re both male and female.
I wished I lived in a world where this was not a political topic.
Surely by 2025 we should understand that gender is multidimensional? And if we don't understand it, perhaps leave it to doctors and psychologists and, you know, the people affected by all of this, the ones who don't find the simple version of gender meets their needs?
This is all well and good, until I’m required or requested to recognize someone else’s self conception as THE correct one, my own eyes be damned…
Paul E. Griffiths made the argument that the gamete definition of sex is correct, but that some people are neither male nor female. For instance, the girl with Turner syndrome would have no biological sex, since she produces no gametes. And if there’s some case in which someone can produce both, then they’re both male and female.